9. The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. 1987. Effects ofenalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Sur- vival Study (CONSENSUS). N EngI J Med 316: 1429 - 1435.
10. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA et al. 1992. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Re- sults of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. N EngI J Med 327: 669 — 677.
11.The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (A1RE) Study Investigators. 1993. Effects of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 342: 821 - 828.
12. TRACE Study Investigators. 1994. An echo-cardiographic method of selecting high risk patients shortly after acute myocardial infarction for inclusion in multi-centre studies (As used in Ihe TRACE study). Eur Heart J 15: 1616 - 1620.
13. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT Jr et al. 1987. Heart rate variability: a predictor of mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 59: 256 — 262.
14.Farrell TG,Paul V.Cripps TR et al. 199 l.Baroreflex sensitivity and electrophysiological correlates in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 83: 945 - 952.
15. Struthers AD. 1993. Plasma concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide: will this new test reduce the need for cardiac investigations? Br Heart J 70: 397 - 398.
16. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. 1994. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344: 1383 - 1389.
17. lesaka Y, Nogami A, Aonuma К et al. 1990. Prognostic significance of sustained mono- morphic ventricular tachyc;irdi,i induced by programmed ventricular stimulation using up to three extra- stimuli in survivors of acute myocardia] infarction. Am J Cardiol 65:
1057 - 1063.
18. Uther JB, Richards DAB, Denniss AR, Ross DL. 1987. The prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction: a review. Circulation 75(suppl 111): II1-161 - 111-165.
19. Bourke JP, Richards DA, Ross DL et al. 1991. Routine programmed ventricular stimu- lation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ven- tricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening. J Am Coil Cardiol 18: 780 - 788.
79
20. Viskin S, Beihassen В. 1994. Should electrophysiology studies be performed in asymp- tomatic patients following myocardial infarction? PACE 109: 959 — 963.
21. Richards DAB, Byth К, Ross DL, Uther JB. 1991. What is the best predictor of spon- taneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction? Circula- tion 83: 756 - 763.
22. Higham PD. Campbell RWF. 1994. QT dispersion. Br Heart J 71: 508 - 510.
23. Nogami A, lesaka Y, Akiyama J et al. 1992. Combined use of time and frequency domain variables in signal-averaged ECG as a predictor of inducible sustained mono- morphic ventricular tachycardia in myocardial infarction. Circulation 86: 780 — 789.
24. Farrell TO, Paul V,Cripps TR et al. 1991. Adrenoreceptor sensitivity and electrophysiological correlates in post-infarction patients. Circulation 83: 945 - 952.
25. LaRovere MT, Specchia G, MortaraA, Schwartz PJ. 1988. Baroreflex sensitivity, clini- cal correlates and cardiovascular mortality among patients with first myocardial infarc- tion: a prospective study. Circulation 78: 816 - 824.
26. Odemuyiwa 0, Malik M, Farrell Т et al. 1991. Comparison of the predictive character- istics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 68: 434 - 439.
Уважаемый посетитель!
Чтобы распечатать файл, скачайте его (в формате Word).
Ссылка на скачивание - внизу страницы.