7.6.1. Chapter 9 describes demand management issues in detail. However, it would appear that the poverty impact case for demand management, particularly congestion pricing, is strong in many developing cities. Generally, it the rich who own and drive cars and thus
a) the direct costs of congestion charging are not borne by the poor;
b) public transport improvements should be integral parts of a congestion pricing scheme; and
c) revenues from congestion pricing could be used to improve quantity and quality of public transport.
7.7.1. Previous Bank[29] urban transport policy made little mention of any linkage between poverty reduction and transport. The view appears to have been taken that transport projects need not be focussed explicitly on poverty reduction since some reduction in poverty will result by increasing economic efficiency through general improvements in the transport system. As noted above, provided measures are aimed at “people” and not “vehicles”, this is probably the case.
7.7.2.
In principle, most recent Bank projects appear to be generally
consistent with this approach and most traffic components investments include
some measures for buses, pedestrians and to a lesser extent, NMT. However,
probably more could be one to promote traffic management measures with direct
poverty alleviation impacts. A brief review of some current projects is shown
in the following table and this demonstrates that while such measures are
included, in the context of each city, they are relatively small in scope. It
is considered that in the context of poverty impact and traffic management, the
main Bank roles should be to promote the cases for traffic management for
buses-pedestrians and where appropriate NMT and to ensure that the modes are at
the forefront of traffic strategy discussions in cities.
Project[30] (date) |
Traffic management measures with immediate poverty alleviation impacts in selected recent projects |
||
Buses |
Pedestrians |
Bicycles |
|
Mumbai Urban Transport Project (2000) |
• 11 km contra flow bus lane demonstration scheme |
• 1 subway • footway repair program as part of bus priority demonstration scheme • pedestrian-over-rail footbridges as part station area improvements |
• None |
Moscow Urban Transport Project (2000) |
• None |
• 1 pedestrian cross-road subway (the city is constructing numerous other pedestrian subways with own resources) |
• None |
Dhaka Urban Transport Project (1998) |
• Bus lanes |
• 40 km footway • repairs to existing footways • 10 footbridges • pedestrian-traffic signals |
• NMT routes off main roads • Pilot NMT network including infrastructure • NMT-MV segregation |
Vietnam Urban Transport Project (1998) |
• None |
• None |
• NMT-MV segregation |
Guangzhou City Centre Transport Project (1998) |
• 5.4 kms bus lane |
• 1.9 kms footway • 30 at grade pedestrian signal controlled crossings |
• 2.4 kms bicycle route |
Lianong Urban Transport Project (Shenyang) |
• Busway • Buys lanes |
• Pedestrian improvements at junctions |
• Segregated NMT and MV routes |
Уважаемый посетитель!
Чтобы распечатать файл, скачайте его (в формате Word).
Ссылка на скачивание - внизу страницы.