Urban Transport Strategy. Management in Developing Countries John A Cracknell, страница 23

♦           Pedestrians;

♦            Cyclists and other NMT’s;

♦           Commercial vehicles;

♦           Environmental management (such as traffic calming); and

♦       Transport system user information; and ♦           Demand management.

2.6.3.      It is this wider definition of traffic management that is used in this Review.

2.7         Limits to supply side traffic management

2.7.1.      While traffic management should be an integral part of the transport policy of any well managed city, there are clearly limitations to its role in increasing “capacity”.  In particular, in developing cities, travel demand is likely to be increasing rapidly and

traffic management measures aimed at increasing capacity will not alone resolve the congestion problems caused by such rapid growth.  Indeed, this is a common reason given by cities for not embracing traffic management with more resolution.  However, this is not the complete picture and a number of inter-related factors should be taken into consideration in planning a traffic management strategy and to increase its relevance to cities where traffic and traffic congestion is increasing:

a)  although the impacts of traffic management measures may be over-taken in a short period unless other measures are taken (such as demand management - as discussed below), the benefits are still “real”, worthwhile and will have been obtained in a very cost-effective way;

b)  provided the policy of improving travel conditions for “people and not vehicles” is accepted and appropriate measures are designed to achieve that objective (such as traffic management measures to provide bus priority), then traffic management has great relevance in cities where traffic congestion is growing;

c)  even at a basic level, traffic management measures which “keep things moving” provides time for more capital intensive measures to be planned and for resources to be obtained;

d)  traffic management should not be a one-time, “one-shot” policy; traffic management should be a continuous process; measures and policies should be adapted as traffic conditions change;

e)  most importantly, traffic management should deal with “demand” as well as “supply” sides of policy.  Traffic management should seek to balance travel demand to a level which promotes maximum system efficiency.  In reality, this means some level of demand management is required in combination with more “supply” side measures (measures which increase capacity).  Demand management is the subject of Chapter 9 of the Review but may be achieved through combinations of measures to reallocate road space to public transport and/or to implement well-understood policies such as parking control and/or to implement innovative measures such as restraint on vehicle ownership and use.

2.8         Conclusion

2.8.1.       The conclusions of the Chapter may be summarised as:

Conclusions from Chapter 2 – Role of Traffic Management

Traffic management should be an integral part of a balanced transport strategy in any well run city.  The general rationale for traffic management is to make the most efficient use of traffic and transport facilities.

The specific objectives are to:

§  make the most efficient use of traffic and transport facilities by improving the movement of people and goods and not necessarily vehicles;

§  improve quality and safety of the traffic system and

§  contribute to the improvement of the traffic related environment.

In addition to the role as part of general transport strategy, traffic management has ancillary roles:

§  to support capital intensive transport investments such as freeways, mass transit systems etc to ensure efficient access and distribution

§  to alleviate traffic congestion impacts arising during construction of major works and §       to alleviate adverse traffic impacts arising from major land use developments.

Traffic management will often need to balance conflicting objectives of various system users to achieve the objectives and this balance can only be achieved by  (i) define objectives clearly at the outset of scheme development,  (ii) defining what impacts or “measures of effectiveness” demonstrate the attainment of those objectives and (iii) carrying out a systematic evaluation of alternatives to determine the optimum mix of policies and measures to meet those objectives.

Traffic management has limits in cities where traffic growth is high but it should be borne in mind that

§  even if impacts are short term, benefits are real and worthwhile

§  traffic management should seek to improve travel conditions for “people” not “vehicles” and thus even in conditions of high traffic growth and congestion, measures such as bus priority have great relevance

§  traffic management should not be a one-time, “one shot” policy but should be a continuous process, adjusted and adapted to meet changing traffic conditions

§ in conditions of high traffic growth, traffic management should seek to apply both supply side measures (increases in capacity) and demand management measures (parking and other more direct measures – see Chapter 9).