Scope of traffic management – a distinction must be drawn between “traffic engineering” and “traffic management”. “Traffic engineering” is an integral part of “traffic management” but is largely confined to the application of physical measures to a road network and junctions usually to ensure an increase in traffic (as opposed to “people”) capacity and/or to ensure safe operation. “Traffic management” embodies a wider concept and is concerned with the comprehensive management of the road based transport system and deals with policies and measures for the entire urban transport system including at least:
♦ |
traffic circulation |
♦ |
public transport (buses and para transit) on-street operations, |
♦ |
management and control of parking, servicing and access |
♦ |
demand management |
♦ |
enforcement of traffic regulations |
♦ |
road safety |
♦ |
pedestrians |
♦ |
bicycles and other non motorised vehicles |
♦ |
commercial vehicles management and |
♦ |
environmental management (such as traffic calming) |
The question was posed to the Review as to "what measures work best" in developing cities. A response in the form of general guideline is not possible. Traffic management measures:
♦ are highly city-specific, depending on city size, level of development, level of traffic congestion, traffic characteristics, ability to enforce etc and measures which are successful in one city may not be appropriate or successful in another;
♦ are most effective if applied on a comprehensive basis (area wide or corridor) rather than as isolated interventions. Traffic management measures are rarely "stand alone" - bus priority will need parking controls, pedestrian measures and junction improvements - an integrated approach is needed; and
♦ will not comprise physical interventions alone. Policy, regulatory and enforcement actions are necessary and success depends on these as much as physical measures. Traffic Management Institutional Arrangements
Traffic Management Agency - in many developing cities, traffic management suffers from:
♦ |
lack of recognition of the need for a strong, professional traffic management agency with well defined powers and responsibilities; |
♦ |
fragmentation of responsibilities between agencies and lack of inter-agency co-ordination; |
♦ |
lack of continuity of staff or work programs due to political change; |
♦ |
inadequate regulatory powers for effective traffic management; |
♦ |
low levels of staffing and lack of professional capacity; |
♦ |
lack of operational and implementation resources; and |
♦ |
lack of traffic regulation enforcement capabilities. |
It is fundamental to the development and implementation of a successful traffic management program that there exists, or is created:
Уважаемый посетитель!
Чтобы распечатать файл, скачайте его (в формате Word).
Ссылка на скачивание - внизу страницы.