Features of Examining a Scene of Actio, and the Identification of Victims in the Criminal Cases in Relation to Acts of Terrorism, страница 13

On the 10th of February of 2005 the North Korea left the six-sided debates and firstly confessed the creation of its own nuclear weapon. “Our nuclear weapons are protective only and they will remain the power of nuclear containment”, - announced in the paper of the representative of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the North Korea.

On the 9th of October of 2006 the North Korea declared the successful completion of the nuclear experiment, followed by several weeks of intensive diplomatic efforts on solving the situation peacefully. On the 14th of October of 2006 the Security Council of the UN mutually signed the resolution of disapproval to the actions of Pyongyang and setting for it limitation sanctions.

The long-term objective of the USA relative to the North Korea is deposition of Kim Cheng Ir’s regime and connection of the North Korea with the South Korea on German scenario but not forcing Pyongyang to suspend the nuclear program.

As an economical sanction Washington blocked about 24 billion dollars belonging to the North Korea in one of the banks in Makao, threatened the North Korea with military actions, but all these measures didn’t help the goals of the USA to be achieved. The North Korea went on developing its nuclear program, making it clear to the USA that they can’t constantly dictate their conditions and threat with using nuclear weapon[26].

As the result such policy of force and threats lead to nothing and the solution of the conflict became possible only with the participation of the other states, e.g. with the conflict leaving the limits of the two countries the USA and the North Korea.

The participants of the negotiations: Russia, the USA, Japan, China, and South Korea – managed to assure Pyongyang to start suspension of its national nuclear program in exchange for economical support.

In the very end the foreign policy of the USA to the rogue countries of the “Evil Axis” appeared to be a complete failure as it brought enormous expenses to the country and lead to the loss of prestige in the world scene. The USA interference into the inner matters of sovereign states is strongly disapproved by the world community. Even the attempts of the United States to build the ABM system on the territory of the countries of the Eastern Europe are taken critically. The European experts are convinced that the creation of the elements of antiballistic missiles system in Check Republic and Poland can’t kit out safety from the North Korean missiles for Europe. It also can’t kit out safety from Iran for the reason that Tehran has no technical devices to send missiles to the Western Europe. Moreover this antiballistic missile system may start a new stage of the armaments race or damage the relations with Russian Federation.

International legal regulation of e-commerce

Ivan Onischenko[27]

Scientific adviser: Anton V. Kostyuk[28]

It is known, that at the international level the legal base of electronic deals is in a stage of formation and basically is presented by model frame laws in a great matter specifying to show the directions of development of legal regulation, than establishing concrete obligatory norms.

In 1996 the electronic commerce model law was developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNSITRAL) with a view of rendering assistance to the states in updating the legislation. This law represents the modeling certificate by means of which the states can solve the basic problems connected with legal regulation of contracts in the national legislation, making by means of electronic data exchange.

In numerous contracts and conventions usage of electronic equivalents of the written form, the signature and documents are not provided. This fact allows to conclude that the problem of electronic commerce have not received legal fastening at the international level. Besides in many international documents there are no unified definitions of such terms as "document", «the written form ", "signatures" owing to what these terms are understood and interpreted ambiguously.