Table 1 Raw water quality of CR source water used for Phase I pilot testing (3-month period)
a Estimated from conductivity measurements. b Calculated based on the above water composition at 25◦C reference temperature. |
requiringthattheCaSO4 saturationindexofthePROconcentrate stream is maintained at unity. For example, such analysis suggested that 60–65% Ca2+ removal from the PRO concentrate, generated from 83% water recovery of CRW (Table 1) would enable SRO stage to achieve a total product water recovery of up to 95%, while ensuring that the concentration of CaSO4 in the SRO concentrate would not exceed saturation.
EffectiveprecipitationsofteningforCa2+ removalviaCaCO3 precipitation can be achieved by pH adjustment with alkaline solutions of caustic (NaOH), lime (Ca(OH)2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), or through combinations of the above chemical reagents. The choice of alkaline reagent would depend on the concentrate composition and chemical cost. For example, in a recent laboratory RO desalting study with CRW [12], it was reported that the PRO concentrate had a molar ratio of total carbonate (CO32−) to total Ca2+ of approximately 1:1. Therefore, in the above system, sufficient CO32− ions were available to precipitate >99% of the Ca2+ ions as CaCO3. For the above concentrate, Ca(OH)2 dosing would not be optimal since it would require the addition of Na2CO3 to deplete the additionally introduced Ca2+. For the CRW PRO concentrate chemistry, following the analysis of Rahardianto et al. [12], NaOH dosing was determined to require the minimal dosing (on a molar basis) to induce CaCO3 precipitation. Therefore, the above process was deemed feasible for field applications, which was evaluated in the present study at the pilot scale.
Уважаемый посетитель!
Чтобы распечатать файл, скачайте его (в формате Word).
Ссылка на скачивание - внизу страницы.