Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflecüve practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Searle, J. 1992. The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shotter, J. 1992. "Getting in touch": The meta-methodology of a postmodern science of mental life. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism: 58— 73. London: Sage.
Spencer, L. M. , & Spencer, S. M. 1993. Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York:
Taylor, F. W. 1911. The principles of scientific management New York: Harper.
Theman, J. 1995. En pedagogisk model för kompetensutveckling [An educational model for competence development]. Göteboœ, Sweden: F.örändringskonsult.
Tyre, M. J. , & Von Hippel, E. 1997. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 1: 71—83.
Weber, M. 1964/1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
Veres, J. G. 111, Locklear, T. S., & Sims, R. R. 1990. Job analysis in practice: A brief review of the role of job analysis in human resources management. In G. R. Ferris, K. M. Rowland, & R. M. Buckley (Eds.), Human resource management: Perspectives and issues: 79—103. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Winograd, T. , & Flores, F. 1986. Understanding computers and cogniüon: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Woodruffe, C. 1990. Assessment centers: Identifying and developing competence. Lóndon: Institute of Personnel Management.
Yukl, G. 1994. Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jörgen Sandberg is an associate professor in the Center for Management and Organization at Stockholm School of Economics. He received his Ph.D. from Göteborg University. His research interests focus on competence and learning in organizations, leadership, social constructionism, and qualitative methods, including their philosophical assumptions.
Copyright of Academy of Management Journal is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However. users may print. download. or email articles for individual use.
[1] What matters concerning the reliability of results within the interpretative approach adopted in this study is not the frequency of statements about the attributes. Instead, the crucial reliability question concerns the conception as a whole and the way in which essential attributes are related to each other. As I described in the Methods section, the interpretative approach used in this study does not focus on the statements themselves, as is common in most forms of content analysis. Rather, a statement has a particular meaning in relation to the context of the surrounding statements and the transcript as a whole.
In this study, reliability was achieved in terms of interpretative awareness and the coding of selected transcripts against a conception and its attributes by an independent researcher achieving agreement of 90 percent. The reliability of the statements was checked in the sense that the independent researcher did not find statements that were inconsistent with the conceptions or their attributes.
[2] In the quotations, the number following "O" indicates the particular optimizer who was speaking.
[3] Numbers are the frequencies with which the attributes were expressed.
Уважаемый посетитель!
Чтобы распечатать файл, скачайте его (в формате Word).
Ссылка на скачивание - внизу страницы.