Strategic Management Journal. Antecedents of temporary advantage, страница 6

Livengood (2010) tested certain aspects of Smith and Cao's (2007) entrepreneurial action model. With an eight-year study of new product introductions (entrepreneurial actions) by cell phone providers, the author found that the greater the novelty of the action, the greater the amount and duration of discourse by market participants (as measured by news media attention). Importantly, he also found that the novelty of the action and the varying amounts of discourse—both the amount and duration—predicted variation in monthly cell phone sales. The unit of analysis was the product introduction followed by discourse measured at the monthly level, followed by monthly cell phone sales. Livengood found that the greatest positive change in sales was immediately after the peak in discourse and that it declined thereafter.

Ultimately, the data one uses for his/her research must match our theory. When our theory is dynamic, our data must be as well. If our theorized relationships are predicted to substantially change and vary in a given year, our data must be detailed enough to capture these potential changes. Under such conditions, researchers may be required to use finer-grained methods, such as case analyses, questionnaires, or content analysis of media accounts of decisions and behaviors that appear in the daily press. And our theory and data will also need to capture the element of time, especially when temporary advantages or disadvantages are rapidly changing. For instance, how can we measure the duration of advantages or the time until they become positive or negative? Does a small two- to three-year advantage outweigh a large two- to three-month advantage? If so, what are the trade-offs?

Certainly there will be markets where traditional models of strategy will still apply (D'Aveni, 1999). However, to understand markets where temporary advantages are the only possibility, we are required to envision, conceive, and establish an entirely new collection of methodological paraphernalia that are more dynamic and match up the current disruptive and fast-speed environments of today. By pulling together various novel perspectives advanced by scholars in the field, we hope this special issue will provide fresh new approaches that will lead to new models and theories of strategy where advantages are not sustainable.

SUMMARY OF EXTANT WORK ON TEMPORARY ADVANTAGE

1.Top of page

2.Abstract

3.Antecedents of temporary advantage

4.The management of temporary advantage

5.Consequences of temporary advantage

6.The field of strategic management without sustainable advantage

7.SUMMARY OF EXTANT WORK ON TEMPORARY ADVANTAGE

8.THIS SPECIAL ISSUE'S UNIQUE CONTRIBUTIONS TO TEMPORARY ADVANTAGE

9.THE FUTURE OF TEMPORARY VERSUS SUSTAINABLE ADVANTAGE: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE OR SIMULTANEOUSLY COEXISTENT?

10.REFERENCES

Let's suspend our belief in sustainable advantage for the moment, realizing it is very rare, declining in duration, and may be the product of a few lucky firms according to the literature referenced above. Table 1 is an overview of some of the literature relevant to temporary advantage.

Table 1. Selected extant work on temporary competitive advantages

Sequences: Long-term patterns or themes of multiple advantages over time

Erosion and compression: Short-term duration and magnitude of a single advantage

Action-based advantages

 • Hypercompetition

 • Competitive dynamics (especially

 response time and type to an action)

 • Evolutionary theory

 • Austrian economics

 • Opportunistic search

 • Creative destruction

Authors:

Authors:

D'Aveni, 1994, 1995a

Livengood and Reger, 2010

Nelson and Winter, 1982

Chen, 1996

Cyert and March, 1963

Schumpeter, 1942

Smith et al., 1992

Smith et al., 1991

Smith and Cao, 2007

Ferrier et al., 1999

Livengood, 2010 (dissertation)

Derfus et al., 2008

Chen, Lin, and Michel, 2009

Young et al., 1996

Resource-based

 • Dynamic capabilities

 • Resource life cycles

 advantages

 • High velocity

 • Strengths and weaknesses

 • New 7S's

Authors:

Authors:

D'Aveni, 1995b

Sirmon et al., 2010

Eisenhardt, 1989

Ndofor, Sirmon, and He, Forthcoming

Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000

Priem, 2007

Helfat and Peteraf, 2003

McGrath, Ferrier, and Mendelow, 2004 (Option theory)

Teece, Pisano, and Shuen, 1997

Bowman and Hurry, 1993

Zahra and Nielsen, 2002

Performance-related advantages

 • Volatility

 • Continuous change

 • Rarity

 • Time compression and duration of

 superior performance

 • Hypercompetitive shift

 • Self-cannibalization

Authors:

Authors:

Thomas, 1996

Nault and Vandenbosch, 1996

McGahn and Porter, 1997

Pacheco-de-Almeida and Zemsky, 2007

Wiggins and Ruefli, 2002

Pacheco-de-Almeida, Henderston, and Cool, 2007

Thomas and D'Aveni, 2009

Helfat, 2000

Wiggins and Ruefli, 2005

Dierickx and Cool, 1989